{"id":354,"date":"2017-06-26T00:46:56","date_gmt":"2017-06-26T00:46:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/salticid.com\/bookblog\/?p=354"},"modified":"2017-06-26T00:46:56","modified_gmt":"2017-06-26T00:46:56","slug":"on-rereading-patricia-meyer-spacks-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/2017\/06\/on-rereading-patricia-meyer-spacks-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"<i>On Rereading<\/i> &#8211; Patricia Meyer Spacks, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I re-read a lot, especially for comfort but also in book groups or to revisit works that are especially meaningful to me. My reading memory is so terrible that I often have forgotten plot and character enough to be surprised again, but even when I do remember, I almost always notice new angles or features. I also love reading about reading, so I was prepared to enjoy this book, but it exceeded my expectations. Spacks articulates many aspects of re-reading that ring true to me:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The experience of reading [<em>Brighton Rock<\/em>] seemed new, although the book itself did not. This distinction is vital to rereading&#8217;s pleasures. Even give perfect memory of a text from previous reading, I would posit, &#8230; the act of rereading under new circumstances, as a new moment, virtually guarantees new thoughts and feelings.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>She examines different kinds of rereading: children&#8217;s books, Jane Austen, &#8220;guilty pleasures,&#8221; books she &#8220;ought to like,&#8221; professional reading (she&#8217;s a professor of English at U of Virginia), and also branches into reading with other people&#8211;revisiting<em> Islandia<\/em>, one of my liked-but-never-got-all-the-way-throughs. Three of the most interesting chapters to me were rereadings of books she associated with the 1950s (<em>Lucky Jim<\/em> and <em>Catcher in the Rye<\/em>), 60s (<em>The Golden Notebook<\/em>), and 70s (<em>The Sacred and Profane Love Machine<\/em> by Iris Murdoch). Many of the books she mentions I&#8217;ve also reread, and even if I didn&#8217;t feel the same way&#8211;the Narnia books haven&#8217;t worn out for me as they have for her&#8211;her descriptions are always interesting and convincing. Her ultimate conclusion is that rereading is more complex than one might think, and that it&#8217;s often more about us changing as people than about the text itself:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To think about my own rereading has encouraged a sense of humility, especially when it comes to questions of value. &#8230; Although I still hold that the question of value deserves pondering in relation to everything read, I&#8217;m no longer sure that such reflection produces solid results in any individual instance. My uncertainly comes from my reversals over the years. &#8230; The really unsettling part is that my standards remain the same. I value complex characterization, effective and elegant prose, meaningful and engaging plot, large import. I find exactly these qualities, however, where I did not find them before; and they have disappeared where I once readily discerned them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I re-read a lot, especially for comfort but also in book groups or to revisit works that are especially meaningful to me. My reading memory is so terrible that I often have forgotten plot and character enough to be surprised again, but even when I do remember, I almost always notice new angles or features. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":357,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354\/revisions\/357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.salticid.com\/bookblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}